Wednesday, 4 March 2015

Fun Facts about Numbers #1

If you ask people their opinion about Mathematics, their answers will most likely vary between absolute dread and sheer hatred. As always, I beg to differ. I like Maths - in fact I like them quite a lot. I was never exceptionally good at Maths, probably above-average though. In Physics we use them a lot, of course, but in a watered-down version, that is, we use all the nice results, without really bothering how they came about. This suits me quite well, because I could never adhere to the strict practice of proving everything. However, this does not mean that I don't enjoy the logic behind an elegant proof. And I say enjoy, because Maths (same as Physics) can actually be mind-bogglingly fun, if you take away a bored (and boring) high-school teacher and exam pressure.

You want a proof? Of course you do, it's Maths after all. So, let's play around with numbers and see some Fun Facts about them.

Mathematicians like to put numbers together in little collections called sets. Here I use the word "collections" instead of "groups" because the linguistic concept of a group is very, very different to the mathematical concept of a group (but that is another story). In Maths you should actually be very careful how you phrase things.

The most basic set of all is the set of natural numbers, often symbolised just with the letter N. These are of course our "normal" numbers, the ones we use for counting, that is N = {0,1,2,3,4,...}. The three dots mean that the set of natural numbers is infinite - it never ends, no matter how long you count. In other words, give me whichever natural number n and make it as large as you want. I can always give you a number that is n+1.

Our first Fun Fact deals with the natural numbers. As you probably know, we have two "types" of natural numbers. The odd ones (like 1,3,5,7 etc) and the even ones (like 0,2,4,6 etc).

FUN FACT 1 = there are as many even natural numbers as there are natural numbers in general.

Wait, WHAT???

How is that *even* possible (see what I did there)? Only every other natural number is even, so there must be half as many evens as there are naturals (or if you wish, twice as many naturals as there are evens). If you take the numbers from 1 to 10, for example, you only find five evens (2,4,6,8,10). So, clearly, there must be more naturals than there are evens.

Well, not quite... The problem here is that we are dealing with infinite sets. Our minds are unfortunately not immediately and directly capable of dealing with the concept of infinity and here is where the misunderstandings begin.

Naturally, we need to prove the Fun Fact. Don't stop reading just yet. It's actually not that difficult. For our proof, we need to introduce the mathematical concept of bijection.

"A bijection is a "rule" that introduces a *one-to-one correspondence* between two sets." 

Bla, bla, bla, waaaaaaaaaaaay too technical... I sound like a bored (and boring) high-school teacher. Good, let's make it simple and have an example:

Imagine you have a room with people (that's one set) and chairs (that's a second set). You also possess the "rule", that is, you have the power to boss people around and tell them where to sit. A one-to-one correspondence means that each person in the room gets to sit on exactly one chair, and each chair in the room is occupied by exactly one person. Every person is sitting, every chair is occupied. Person <-> Chair. One-to-one

Congratulations! You have found a bijection between the people and the chairs in the room. You can (hopefully) see that if you can find a bijection between two sets, it means that the sets have equal sizes; they have the same number of elements. In our example, there are as many people as there are chairs in the room.

We are all set now to prove the Fun Fact: take the set of naturals N={0,1,2,3,4,5,...} and take another set, let's call it S, consisting of all even naturals, S={0,2,4,6,8,10,...}. Now, take a "rule" n -> 2·n and apply it to the set N, i.e.

N -> rule -> S
--------------
0 -> 2·0 = 0
1 -> 2·1 = 2
2 -> 2·2 = 4
3 -> 2·3 = 6
4 -> 2·4 = 8
5 -> 2·5 = 10
...

As you can see, each number in N is transformed, via our "rule", to a number in S. In fact, each number in N is transformed to exactly one number in S, and vice versa, each number in S corresponds to exactly one number in N. We have one-to-one correspondence.

No matter which number n you choose from N, you can always find the unique, corresponding, even number s in S, through the rule n -> 2·n = s. And you can do this exactly because S is infinite.

So, our "rule" n -> 2·n is a bijection between N and S. But, as we have already seen, the existence of a bijection between N and S means that N and S have the same size. They have the same number of elements!

So, indeed, there are as many even natural numbers as there are natural numbers in general.

How is this for mind-boggling fun?

And a simple question to see if you have been paying attention:

Can you find a bijection between the natural numbers and the odd natural numbers? What does this mean?

The Return of the Fellowship of the Ring to the Two Towers

Blatantly copying the title of one of my favourite South Park episodes (S06E13) to post something after a very long dry spell (easily comparable to those of the Atacama desert).

A lot has happened in these (give or take) 8 months, most notably a transatlantic household-move to take up a job on one of the seven Canary Islands.

BTW, the name of the islands should not be confused with the lovely little yellow bird. It is derived from the latin word "canis", which means dog (as in Presa Canario).

Obviously, I make no promises on subsequent frequency of posting, but hey ho...

Friday, 20 June 2014

Omelette

I've had a longstanding argument with a certain someone about how funny British comedy is. She refuses to watch the Inbetweeners, was indifferent to Dara's awesome show and is, generally, a fervent supporter of State-side stuff. I am however known for my stubbornness, so I will keep trying, until she converts (or stops talking to me...)

You have to love the facial expressions and naivety of the waitress, right? 

A blast from the past #3 - Part 4

Blast from the past indeed, as I've been too busy to update the blog for a couple of months now. Anyway, here's the final part of the super-duper-cool TV cartoon series I used to watch when I was growing up (oh, well, and still do).

(23) Silverhawks



(24) Starblazers (a.k.a. Space Battleship Yamato)



(25) Starcom



(26) Thunderbirds 2086 



(27) Thundercats



(28) Thundersub (a.k.a. Space Carrier Blue Noah)



(29) Transformers



(30) Ulysses 31



(31) Visionaries



(32) Voltron



(33) X-Men

Friday, 4 April 2014

The Fifth Solvay International Conference, 1927

If you are a physicist, or work in a Physics-related field, or simply like the stuff, you either cry or get a boner when you look at the picture below (don't ask me where I stand...)

If you, on the other hand, hate Physics or are otherwise not-normal, all you see is a bunch of serious looking guys in tuxedos... and a not-so-fashionable woman. So, you might as well stop reading now.

Taken in Leopold Park in Brussels in October 1927, during the Fifth Solvay International Conference, it depicts the most intelligent group of people ever to grace a photograph. 17 of the 29 attendees were or became Nobel Prize winners!


Who are they? Well, I'm certain that everyone can recognise the guy sitting in the middle of the front row (Albert Einstein, duh). Depending on your relation to science, you might be able to at least guess the identity of the only woman in the picture (Madam Curie, of course). And, while you will most likely not recognise the guy standing in the middle of the back row, you have probably heard of his... cat! Indeed, that is Erwin Schrödinger.

So, shall we meet the rest of the people who have effectively shaped the world as we know it today?

NPP = Nobel Prize in Physics
NPC = Nobel Prize in Chemistry

FRONT ROW, LEFT TO RIGHT
Irving Langmuir (American, 1881-1957, NPC: 1932) 
Max K. E. L. Planck (German, 1858-1947, NPP: 1918) 
Marie Skłodowska-Curie (Polish/French, 1867-1934, NPP: 1903, NPC: 1911)
Hendrik A. Lorentz (Dutch, 1853-1928, NPP: 1902) 
Albert Einstein (German, 1879-1955, NPP: 1921)
Paul Langevin (French, 1872-1946)
Charles-Eugène Guye (Swiss, 1866-1942)
Charles T. R. Wilson (Scottish, 1869-1959, NPP: 1927)
Owen W. Richardson (English, 1879-1959, NPP: 1928)

MIDDLE ROW, LEFT TO RIGHT
Peter J. W. Debye (Dutch/American, 1884-1966, NPC: 1936)
Martin H. C. Knudsen (Danish, 1871-1949)
William L. Bragg (British, 1890-1971, NPP: 1915)
Hendrik A. Kramers (Dutch, 1894-1952)
Paul A. M. Dirac (English, 1902-1984, NPP: 1933)
Arthur H. Compton (American, 1892-1962, NPP: 1927)
Louis V. P. R. de Broglie (French, 1892-1987, NPP: 1929)
Max Born (German, 1882-1970, NPP: 1954)
Niels Bohr (Danish, 1885-1962, NPP: 1922)

BACK ROW, LEFT TO RIGHT
Auguste A. Piccard (Swiss, 1884-1962)
Émile Henriot (French, 1885-1961)
Paul Ehrenfest (Austrian/Dutch, 1880-1933)
Édouard Herzen (Belgian, 1877-1936)
Théophile E. de Donder (Belgian, 1872-1957)
Erwin R. J. A. Schrödinger (Austrian, 1887-1961, NPP: 1933)
Jules-Émile Verschaffelt (Belgian, 1870-1955)
Wolfgang E. Pauli (Austrian, 1900-1958, NPP: 1945)
Werner K. Heisenberg (German, 1901-1976, NPP: 1932)
Ralph H. Fowler (English, 1889-1944)
Léon N. Brillouin (French, 1889-1969)

OK, so, you've read the names, but you still have no idea who they are. Let's have a quick look at a selected few:  

Planck (in my humble view, a titan among giants) was the one who conceived the idea of quantums ("the most revolutionary idea which ever has shaken physics" according to Max Born) paving the way for the creation of Quantum Mechanics (QM).  

Dirac (in my humble view, another titan among giants) (i) introduced his eponymous equation which allows for the accurate description of the behaviour of all elementary matter particles, (ii) introduced the nowadays globally used formalism of QM and (iii) predicted the existence of anti-matter.  

Bohr (whose hydrogen atom model was the first QM model), Kramers, Born (whose probabilistic interpretation of Schrödinger's  wave function ended determinism in physics),  Pauli (whose Exclusion Principle explains the periodic table of elements), Heisenberg (whose Uncertainty Principle lies at the core of QM), de Broglie (who introduced the wave-particle duality) and Schrödinger (whose wave-function equation is one of the most fundamental in QM), along with Dirac developed the theory of Quantum Mechanics.  

Lorentz came up with the eponymous transformations, a key ingredient in Einstein's Special Relativity Theory.

Curie, was the first woman to be awarded a Nobel Prize, one of only four individuals to have won more than one NP and one of only two individuals to have won more than one NP in different fields. She died of radiation poisoning, a result of her work.

TRIVIA:
Einstein's Nobel Prize was for the explanation of the Photoelectric Effect. He never received a Nobel for his Relativity Theories.
Piccard was the inspiration for the character of Professeur Tryphon Tournesol in the comic book series "The Adventures of Tintin" by Belgian cartoonist Hergé.

Tuesday, 25 March 2014

WTF news #4...

Taking a small break from "Blast from the Past" to share this innovative teaching method which ensures full cooperation from your students, by threatening to reveal... spoilers from their favourite series!

Read and enjoy!